THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 (originally published)
For those of you who don’t believe that that mythical corner of mine where I do my street writing really exists, I decided it was safe to publish a picture of the location and that it would present no security threat to our country…or any other country for that matter. This shot was partially accidental since I was taking pics of the Historic Route 66 sign (just getting my kicks for the day – if you know the song) and captured the street signs coincidentally.

(My corner in the blogosphere where I street write.
No photoshop was used, honest!)
(Route 66 was written by Bobby Troup – playing here- for his wife Julie London while they were driving from Chicago to L.A.- enjoy… this is great!)
I think that my heart rate must have been up to 90% of max and the oxygen supply to my brain suddenly dropped on today’s 45 minute early morning walk to Heaven because I started considering the holiday season…in mid-September! Aside from the stores marketing Halloween stuff since July 5th, I heard “Proud Mary” on Pandora and Thanksgiving came to mind? Don’t get the connection? Not to worry, I’ll make it all work after a few hundred words and a song and a video clip. History and politics can be fun (oops, did I just telegraph a blow?). I promise to try not to be too pedantic even if using the word pedantic is, in and of itself, pedantic. But I digress…
In 1972 while attending lectures by Andrew J. Galambos at his Free Enterprise Institute, he related to us an important piece of historical analysis about the Plymouth Colony experience. It is very relevant to the challenges that we, as a country face today (for you folks who live outside of the USA – and there are a few of you- please don’t stop reading because this is an important historical lesson for you as well, I believe). Nearly every Thanksgiving since 1972 I have retold the story of the first Thanksgiving at our family dinner; so even though I’m a little ahead of the season, current events of the day demand that that story be retold now- before the fall elections.
In March of 1623 the Plymouth Pilgrims lead by Governor William Bradford were in desperate trouble. They had nearly starved to death during that cold, long winter. When they arrived in 1620, they had agreed to operating the colony as a commune in which the land they were farming was owned by the “collective” (in other words no private ownership) and all that was produced was placed in a central storehouse. Any money made from selling the fruits of their labor was also held in a communal account. In turn all the Pilgrims needs were provided for from the central storehouse according to each colonist’s “need” including food, clothing, housing, tools and other provisions. They limped along under that system through the winters of 1620, 1621, and 1622, but by the spring of 1623 they were nearly out of provisions and money because production had fallen to between little and none. The attitude of the colonists had progressively deteriorated over the three years from co-operative and energetic to weak, depressed, and unmotivated to work resulting in ever decreasing production of crops and manufactured goods and services such as carpentry, clothing and other small commodities of life. The colonists were demoralized and unmotivated. It was a disaster waiting to happen…soon!
Governor William Bradford kept a record this whole dismal situation during those years. He observed that the women had become unwilling to work in the fields because, they complained, they were weak, sick, and unable to do the work and to have forced them do so would have been oppressive and tyrannical. He observed that younger men who were very capable of doing the hard physical work of farming, were also unmotivated. They complained that, while other older men were feigning sickness and hung out in the town to avoid work along with the “weak and sick” women, they would have to do their work for them in the fields for no compensation. There was no compensation for anyone. Everyone worked as they were able and took what they “needed” from the storehouse. The younger men didn’t believe toiling in the fields while slackers pretended illness and were waited on by the women instead of working was particularly fair. It sucked.
Bradford, after carefully considering the whole situation hoped they might increase their production of crops before the next winter (and starvation of all the colonists if no action was taken to correct the problem), decided to make a change in how they organized the colony. He wanted to end to “their languishing in misery”; so he announced that the commune would be disbanded and from that point forward every family would have its own parcel of land to farm and they would keep (or trade) whatever they produced and the money they might receive from the sale of that crop. What happened next is one for the books, so to speak.
Bradford recounted that this (i.e. Free Enterprise and Private Ownership) brought immediate success because everyone had become “very industrious”. The women now went willingly in the fields schlepping their kids with them to help plant corn. Bradford noted that this type of socialist experiment (i.e. the socialist commune) had failed before (this was the first time in America, of course) and that Plato (who had been applauded for these views in earlier times) had been wrong in his belief that if you take away private property and place it in the hands of a central planning committee that the community will be happy and flourish. In practice, observed Bradford, such a socialist community (as the colonists were operating) was found to “breed confusion and discontent and retard much employment”. He noted that the younger men had not wanted to invest their time and energy doing work for other men’s wives and children without compensation or proprietary interest willing went to work in their own fields.
And so, after establishing a free enterprise system in the colony in the spring of 1623, the harvest, that fall, was so plentiful that the Pilgrims were able to thank the Massasoit Indians for all of their help and advice by having a great feast. This was the real first Thanksgiving celebration: celebrating the victory of Free Enterprise over Socialism. This is no fairy tale nor is it a legend. It is from a factual account of what happens when people have been reduced to poverty and starvation by a failed ideology and react by making a real, positive change for their own survival. They did what works and that was the right thing to do just as is will be in Cuba…and in the USA when we resurrect the Free Enterprise system starting with the November elections.
So, what’s the deal with Cuba? I thought , according to our liberals, that it was a shining example of how a collective, socialist, commune should work and that we should be following their model starting with universal health care and then jobs for all as government employees (at least that’s the dream, but oh wait, aren’t we livin’ the dream these days?). Apparently there’s trouble in the Cuban socialist paradise because Fidel Castro told the AP last Wednesday that “The Cuban (economic) model doesn’t even work for us anymore.” Then, after the Talkosphere made the whole world aware of the Cuban experiments failure, Fidel did an Olympics qualifying back- stroke and tried to say that he had been “misinterpreted” (does that mean we didn’t understand what he meant to say or that the Spanish interpreter was incompetent?).
Oh really? Then why did Brother Raul announce a couple of days later that Cuba (i.e. Socialist Paradise) would be laying off 500,000 state workers by 2011 and up to 1,000,000 somewhat later? Furthermore, Brother Raul said that these people were being released to find jobs in the non-existent private sector (now that’s desperation on the hoof). Did Socialism fail yet again? Bingo! Maybe Hollywood could give Brother Raul a part as William Bradford in a movie about the Plymouth Colony. His big line will be, “Every man for himself!” If Cuba has a bountiful harvest next fall maybe they could celebrate their own Thanksgiving Day: the day they threw Socialism off the island (just like the colonists did in 1623) and we need to do in November of 2010.
And then there’s our current liberal Congress and President racing at warp speed toward the Cuban Socialist Economic Model. They are Hell bent for election… or maybe not being reelected, as the case may be… which brings me to this November and the reselection of our Free Enterprise economic system (I know, chill, there is no such word. I made it up. It’s contraction of “resurrection” and “election” and I thought you’d like it better than “elecercetion”). Our economy in the tank, our spending is over the top, and our taxes are on the verge of being confiscatory. Our auto, banking, and Insurance, and health care industries have been nearly nationalized. Our freedom of speech and right to bear arms have been weakened and the Constitution as a whole is under assault, the value of our money has been reduced and government employment is expanding rapidly into massive government. It’s the winter of 1623 all over again for the United States of America (or the summer of 2010 in Cuba) and we must choose.
Okay, time for a break. This is pretty heavy (i.e. pedantic) stuff and I haven’t explained “Proud Mary” yet. I realized about half way through the song that it could be a metaphor for the resurrection of the Free Enterprise economic system in the USA. It speaks to the near slavery of socialism and the proud, freedom of Free Enterprise “rollin’ on the river”. I know that’s not what it was originally written about…but the connection was, for me, still there. The “Proud Mary” of Free Enterprise is, as we speak, moored tightly to the dock of government control and interference and soon will be completely dismantled. She needs to be cut loose again to ply the river waters of true freedom…Free Enterprise needs to keep on rollin’ on the river…
Breaks over…
We must choose between a government that will continue to herd us, mostly against our will, into a giant failing commune where we become demoralized, unproductive, poverty stricken, miserable, and starving to death (actually probably literally given enough time)…
or…
We can choose to hit the restart button for our government and resurrect Free Enterprise by rebooting Free Enterprise 2.0. We do that by electing a congress in November (and President in two years) who will say, as did William Bradford (or, gulp, Raul Castro, if you can believe it), “Every man (or woman) for themselves”. In other words, we need to stop looking to government (i.e. the central storehouse) for all of our needs. We need to stop looking for something for nothing and get out there and produce enough for our own needs. “To each by his needs; from each by his ability” is the Socialist motto. It should be: “From our own abilities; provide for our needs”. So how do we do this? How do we get there from here?
The answer is: Just one thing!
Jack Palance in the movie City Slickers had it right when he softly said, “Just one thing…,”and here it is: the mid-term elections are in two months and with them comes the season of conservatives cannibalizing each other and confusing the heck out of all of us. When the candidates get done shredding each other over ideological differences we end up scratching our heads in dismay and the liberal opposition has a cargo ship full of ammunition. Worse yet, we read all the flyers, OP-EDs, and listen to debates and analysis and discover that there is no candidate who will represent us the way we want on all the issues that we are passionate about. I guarantee that every single candidate will fail you in some way; sooner or later. If it’s not abortion; it will be oil drilling. If it’s not gun control; it will be freedom of speech. If it’s not health care; it will be same sex marriage. If it’s not immigration then it will be global warming … and on and on. All of these issues are important and even critical to the future of our country, but there is one issue that supersedes all of these. There is one issue that must be addressed if we are to have any opportunity at all to even discuss these other critical topics, let alone fix them.
Drum roll please …
It is absolutely critical that we resurrect Free Enterprise in the United States of America. Without an underlying economic foundation built on Free Enterprise we will not even have a chance to debate the many important issues that are currently on the table.
Why is that? It is because if we allow our Free Enterprise system is be destroyed by the forces of Socialism (or any other derivative of generic “Collectivism” such as Communism or Fascism- let’s not quibble over this point) we will be forfeiting our right to vote first in the market place and then in the voting booth. The Market Vote is, in many ways more powerful than the Political Vote. In the market we vote for the businesses and goods that we think are best for us, but when Socialism is fully empowered (and make no mistake – a little Socialism always becomes 100% Socialism in time) we have given up that right and let the “State” determine what businesses and goods are best for us. Once we let that happen (as it is trying to happen as we speak) we lose the most powerful vote that we have and then our political vote becomes nothing more than Kabuki for a Strongman or Oligarchy type government.
Then we become Venezuela or Russia or China where they make a show of how much the people have to say about any key issue and political voting, but it’s just theater to justify a small group of self appointed thugs telling you how you will run every aspect of your life while they live theirs in opulence and abundance.
Our political vote only has real meaning and value if it is securely bolted down to a foundation of Free Enterprise and the Capitalist method of governing the economy by voting every day in the market place of goods and services.
So what does this mean for upcoming elections? It means that our first priority in our political voting must be to vote for those candidates who will insist that we, as a county, state, or city, support legislation that helps to rebuild our Free enterprise system and allow us to continue to market vote.
That is mission number one if we want to even have the right and chance to debate and argue over all the other social issues and find a workable solution as opposed to having some self serving, non-productive, coercive Socialist solution crammed down our collective throats.
If a candidate supports Free Enterprise then we must, for a brief time, set aside our passions for our pet social issue and combine forces to resurrect Free Enterprise first. We must realize that we have this one goal in common: Free enterprise will allow us to keep our country free to be fallen, free to disagree, and free to work out workable solutions (as opposed to “perfect solutions” from all knowing government leaders). We must cut through the maze of accusations and social issue fog to find out just one thing about each candidate: do they support Free Enterprise? That’s it! One thing…just one thing!
Okay, here are a few things to look for to determine if a candidate is a Conservative who supports Free Enterprise (Beware: Liberals- which includes a number of Conservatives/Republicans in name only- worship the central storehouse approach except when they lie about it and say they support Free Enterprise; mostly at election time):
• Do they want to reduce taxes of all type?
• Do they want to reduce red tape regulations that inhibit business growth?
• Do they believe that businesses should be allowed to fail if they screw-up rather than bailing them out?
• Do they support Tort Reform?
• Do they want smaller government?
• Do they believe that government should get out of the car, insurance, oil, medical, and banking business.
• Do they believe in balanced budgets?
• If they demonize businesses for profit, big corporations or insurance companies they are not a Free Enterprisers.
• If they say that we need bigger government and more power for our leaders then they are not a Free Enterprisers.
• If they they say , “I believe in Capitalism, but…,” then they not a Capitalist: they are a ”Capibut” which is a Socialist trying to make you think they are a Free Enterpriser. Remember, being a little bit Socialist is like being a little bit pregnant: eventually you give birth to the full blown Frankenstein monster. Once a Socialist starts to take control of a small part of the economy they must, eventually, control it all because the market place begins to knock itself down like dominoes.
Please help save our country from “languishing in misery” like the Plymouth colonists by joining the effort to elect Free Enterpriser, Conservatives to office this fall and in 2012. Vote for them and send them a dollar or two no matter where they are in the country. Tea Party Express http://www.teapartyexpress.org/ is a website that publishes a list of conservative candidates in need.
It is imperative that we focus on this issue first. If, in our mind, we disqualify a Free Enterpriser candidate because they disagree with us on one of the numerous social issues then we are positioning ourselves to forfeit our right to address these issues in the future. Elect a Free Enterpriser and keep us free to screw-up or succeed, free to make wrong decisions as well as correct ones, free be fat or thin, free to drive cars or ride bikes, free to eat beef or veggies, and most of all: free to be fallen or saved.
LDTG
Remember…focus on just one thing!

